I have been an avid reader of Science for many decades, and I knew two of your predecessors -- Dan Koshland and Don Kennedy -- very well. Neither of them would have stooped to the sort of woke biases and commentaries that have marked your tenure. I am one of many in the scientific community who wish you'd spend less time on DEI and more on issues like the need for new nuclear power plants and more evidence-based regulation of genetic engineering
Speaking of "quite mystical", is anyone any less mysterious ;)
Ain't it all summed up in the ancient:
And, yet it moves ;)
I have been an avid reader of Science for many decades, and I knew two of your predecessors -- Dan Koshland and Don Kennedy -- very well. Neither of them would have stooped to the sort of woke biases and commentaries that have marked your tenure. I am one of many in the scientific community who wish you'd spend less time on DEI and more on issues like the need for new nuclear power plants and more evidence-based regulation of genetic engineering
Very cool, Holden. It’s good to see Science branching out in all these ways. It’s so important to have commentary and discussion in this space.